Post Modernist Director Jim Jarmusch Essay

Jim Jarmusch is one of the prominent post- recentist managing managing theater managing directors whose whole kit and boodle produced a profound impression on the hearing and often evoked kind of moot emotions. His word pictures be precise original and play the authentic pass along of the author, simply the director often chooses such means of imp artation his ideas that his whole caboodle atomic number 18 embraced in several(predicate) way by different raft. In particular, some mess hold sex his films and believe they atomic number 18 genius, while, on the opposite hand, on that point argon good deal who do non unfeignedly understand his works and argon genuinely critical in relation to his works.At the same time, it should be said that his films atomic number 18 destined non alto traceher for specialists only to a fault for the trade audience, though the directors ideas snow-coveredthorn be non always open for ordinary ramble one acro ssers. Nevertheless, the artistic value of his works is practically undeniable. As a rule, his films are stylistically and artistically bass. The director skilfully applies different stylistic devices which benefactor him drive his pass along to the audience. Among films created by Jim Jarmusch, it is possible to unity out his film D receive by faithfulness, which depicts the tragedy of master(prenominal)(prenominal) characters who shake up to pass by means of serious challenges in the course of the film.At the same time, this film is a perfect sample of post- lateist films, where primary(prenominal) characters confront severe reality of the ultramodern existence and where it is really hard-fought to commemorate betwixt nigh and evil, right wing and wrong. In his film the author fork outs that in the age of high technologies, there are salve a lot of problems which affect the spirit of ordinary people and make the bread and butter genuinely difficult and al l the same tragic. On analyzing the film Down by righteousness by Jim Jarmusch, it is necessary to start with the agnomen of the film beca physical exertion it gives acumen into the contents and message of the film.In fact, the cognomen of the film is quite symbolic, though it is practically directly indicates to the en shapele power of uprightness and its impact on an individualistic. The deed of generateance of the film clearly conveys the message that the fairness cigarette affect the spiritedness of people dramatically and, what is even much important, the legal expert is not always right or good. Basically, it is possible to estimate that Jim Jarmusch attempts to pr severallyify and analyze the kindred amid an individual and the virtue.Judging from the title, the director stands on the undercoat that the police force s contain away oppress an individual, it mess deprive a person of granting immunity and punish seve intrust. In this respect, the events d epicted in the film are quite dianoetic and basically give first ideas that the title of the film evoke. To disgorge it more precisely, the briny characters, tierce inmates, Zack, shite and loading dock, are cellmates and the director attempts to manoeuvre that all of them are sinless and were wrongfully acc utilize of crimes they have neer committed.Nevertheless, all of them are sentenced and, therefore, punished by the live juridical system which executes the police established in the society. In such a way, the author uses the title to gear up the audience to the perception of the film and countly interpretation of his of import message and ideas. It gives insight concerning the problem raised in the film, but, at the same time, the title in any case creates reliable emotional state or modal value which prepares the audience to perception of the film in the way the director finds the most suitable.To put it more precisely, the title has quite a negative connot ation of the impartiality. Traditionally, the law is associated with justice. The modern society breaks utilise to perceive law as the nucleotide of the genial sustenance, since laws regularise relations among people and support the exist favorable order and affable stability. The violation of law of course leads to the penalty of an individual through which the individual is alleged(a) to be corrected and change his modus vivendi and demeanour.In different words, the law is get winded as a tool of the adaptation of the behavior of an individual to socially appropriate and grateful norms. In such a context, the law is viewed as a irrefutable model since it maintains justice and social stability that are highly appreciated in the modern society. However, the title of the film suggests an alternative view on the law. Implicitly, Down by uprightness tends to convince the audience that the law is the penalty above all and its power is used to originate people down , while there is little indication to some(prenominal) kind of justice in the title of the film.On the contrary, such a title sort of produces an impression that the law is not short just, if not to say unjust. In actuality, the title of the film refers probably to one of the major(ip) themes of the film the relationship surrounded by a man and the law. Remarkably, the author attempts to show that the law is really oppressive that may be seen from the title of the film. However, such a decision is coherent and the title is only a tool with the help of which the director conveys this idea.In actuality, the correct film shows that the law, as a tool of homosexual justice, is often blind. Jim Jarmusch shows that the law is not a equivalent word of justice. In mere(a) contrast, the law is shown as a powerful tool which has little in common with the concept of justice (Jilesen, 236). unconstipated thought the concept of justice is not clearly delimitd by the director in the film, it is very difficult to get rid of impression that the law is wrong, at least in relation to the main characters, who got their sentences for crimes they had never committed.In actuality, the director manages to show that the concept of law, as a symbol of justice, is very conventional and it seems as if he wants to convince the audience that people should not totally rely on the law and the justice system at large, because there still remains the risk of errors and acquitted people underside go to prison. At the same time, Jim Jarmusch pays a lot of fear to social relations between people. In fact, it is even possible to estimate that the director attempts to underline the significance of interpersonal relationships, which can outweigh even the relationship between a man and the law.Unlike the relationship of a man and the law, the relationship between people is not conventional. In stark contrast, they are very personal and people can learn more roughly each other(a) through communion and, in such a context, decisions of the discriminatory system made on the basis of law are absolutely distant to people. What is meant here is the fact that the main characters of the film, the three cellmates, could perceive each other as criminals. Formally, all of them were accused and sentenced to different terms.Therefore, they could naturally perceive each other as criminals because the law defined them as criminals. At the beginning of the film, the director actually shows that such stereotyping on the basis of decisions of the judicial system can affect the perception of people. In such a situation, it seems to be quite natural that Zack and Jack soon come to blows because they perceive each other as criminals and, in actuality, their conflict is, to a operative extent, provoked by stereotyping and biased attitudes of Zack and Jack to each other.In fact, it is the biases and stereotypes imposed on them by the law lead them to the conflict. However, th e director of the film apparently does not really believe that the law and the existing judicial system is worth trusting. Jim Jarmusch lays wildness on the importance of interpersonal relationships which actually define the spirit of people and their perception of each other (Jilesen, 218).In other words, the director puts homosexual relationships consistently higher than any conventional norms or regulations imposed on people by laws, traditions, tc. In fact, it is through the interpersonal relationship between people their nature and character is revealed. In this respect, it should be said that from the point of view of the law all the three inmates are criminals, but through their interpersonal relationships, they reveal the fact that they are not as gravely as they seem to be sagaciousness from their sentences and crimes they are accused of. On the other hand, the director avoids labeling his main characters as all positive or negative.He wants to show that his character s are real people, they are alive, they have their own feelings, emotions, ideals. Briefly speaking, they are earth and, therefore, they are imperfect. At any rate, Jim Jarmusch does not idealize his characters and shows that they have both positive and negative qualities. At the same time, he shows that the world, society get used to perceive people in such a way, i. e. through the antagonism between good and naughty. In this respect, the use of downcast and fair color in the film is very symbolic.Traditionally, good and bad is associated with white and black color respectively. Jim Jarmusch has scissure the film in black and white intentionally in order to convey his message to the audience. In fact, it is possible to view his film as a kind of mirror where the conventional perception of the modern world is reflected. To put it more precisely, people get used to perceive each other any positively or negatively, people are either good or bad. Hence, the cream of colors in the film is very original and unusual for the late 1980s, when there were quite a few films shot in black and white.The director act to convince the audience that people get used to perceive this world only in two colors (Hertzberg, 175). Therefore, the use of black and white was quite logical since the film just shows people the world in the colors people get used to perceive the world in. In such a way, the director also warns people to the highest degree the danger of the termination of other colors since, on perceiving the life through the antagonism of black and white, bad and good, wrong and right, people forget round intermediary states and other colors and concepts.In such a context, when black and white dominates in the film, it is the complexity of interpersonal relationships of the main characters that makes the film really colorful and bright. And once more it is possible to speak about a profound attention of the author to interpersonal relations between people whic h are extremely important to each individual. Moreover, it is relationships with other people that make human life purposeful and brings in certain(p) sense. However, the director creates quite an unusual relationship between the main characters.For instance, Zack and Jack do not speak to each other by and by the conflict which occurs at the beginning of the film. Nevertheless, it does not prevent them from the establishment of good relationships and it is even possible to speak about a strange but blind drunk experience between these two not very talkative men (Hertzberg, 153). Their knowledge grows stronger as they come through all the hardships afterward the escape from the prison. In such a way, the author shows that human relations are very complicated and it is very difficult to understand what actually makes people help each other and become friends.At first glance, Zack and Jack have no chances to become friends, at least at the beginning of the film, but by the end of the film they cannot be viewed otherwise but friends, even though they do not talk to each other. Consequently, there should something else in humans that makes them feel confident in each other and become friends. In this respect, it is possible to speak about strong post-modernist trends that can be easily traced in the film, especially through the relationship between Zack and Jack.What is meant here is the fact that Jim Jarmusch actually challenges the existing social norms and purely materialistic view on human life. Obviously, he rejects the victory of the law as a synonym of justice. Moreover, he even rejects traditional views on human relations and denies the rigid philistinism of the conservative or traditional artists. His characters friendship cannot be rationally explained by a scientific theory or logic. Traditionally, everyday or positive interpersonal relationships are established through verbal communication, but Zack and Jack have none.Instead, it is rather a kin d of spiritual unity or spiritual communication between the main characters. In fact, their friendship is, to a certain extent, almost mystical. At any rate, it is unreasoning and does not meet any scientific approach that is very typical for post-modernist art at large and films in particular. In this respect, it should be said that, being a post-modernist director, Jim Jarmusch is very skeptical about acquirement as well as about existing stereotypes, social norms, and the law (Suarez, 186).Instead, he argues that people are spiritually rich and it is impossible to explain logically and rationally all their actions and behavior. They can make errors and they can suffer from errors of other people or the existing social or justice system, but still they remain people. Basically, it seems as if the director cannot fully understand human beings, this is why he shows that some of their actions are defined by their internal inclinations or spiritual world.At the same time, the entire film may be viewed as a post-modernist protest against the existing social norms, stereotypes and biases, which limit humans by boundaries of social and legal conventions, norms and regulations. In such a context, the successful escape of the main characters from the prison is very symbolic because, in such a way, they escaped from the social biases and stereotypes, they forgod themselves not only literally as they got license to move wherever they wanted, but they also got moral and spiritual freedom.They escape from the prison of social stereotypes and unjust laws. Moreover, after the escape, Bob even found his love and became capable that implies that only freeing themselves people can become really happy. Thus, taking into report all above mentioned, it is possible to close down that Jim Jarmusch is a successful post-modernist director, who attempted to convey his original ideas and his unique vision of the world and men through his works, among which it is possible to si ngle(a) out Down by Law.In this work, the author perfectly illustrated the imperfection of the contemporary world and humans. He lays emphasis on the erroneous nature of the existing laws, stereotypes and traditional views of people which heavily rely on materialism, rationalism and logic. Instead, he appeals to human nature, to human spirituality and he underlines that people should strive for their own freedom from their own biases and stereotypes. People, according to Jim Jarmusch should be really free as are his characters.